Publications & News

The Time Factor in Recruiting – The Candidate’s Perspective

JR BECHTLE & Co.

The Time Factor in Recruiting - The Candidate's Perspective

JR BECHTLE & Co. | January 2020 | Publications

The Time Factor in Recruiting – The Candidate’s Perspective

“As time goes by”… many people will be familiar with the song that accompanies the romance between Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman in the film “Casablanca”. The end of the movie is well-known and figuratively speaking, there are some parallels to the recruiting process from the candidate’s perspective.

At the initial contact the recruiter will present the client (the most important part) and the position to the candidate in order to ascertain and spark interest, while learning about the motivation for a possible change of employment on the part of the candidate. If interested, a process is set in motion which consumes a certain amount of time and commitment depending on the availability of all participants involved including recruiter, candidate, and client.

How the candidate interprets the duration of this whole process is important for the hiring company, even if this isn’t always communicated in a direct fashion. The process includes the candidate and the company getting to know each other in a personal meeting, and then there’s a mutual decision with him/her to come together. The company’s upper management meanwhile strongly reiterates the urgency of filling the critical position, and then: “… time goes by …”

If too much time elapses

the candidate (who is interested in the position) begins to question the position’s relevance for the company, and the priority that the management has attached to getting the right person on-board. At this point, too, the candidate is getting a first-hand impression of the company’s approach and culture. In most cases the selected candidate is set to assume a key management role, and thus will represent the company and its “corporate culture” in the future. Is he/she able then to correct a somewhat negative or ambiguous first impression?

Herein lies the dilemma for the candidate and the potential employer. A period of “silence”, for whatever reason, is generally interpreted by the candidate as disinterest in his/her person or as a sign of “less than serious” intentions by the company. In today’s media world comments (mostly the bad ones) make their way very quickly onto known platforms, and thus could negatively affect the “corporate rating” and attractiveness of the company for future candidates.

Continuous Communication

between candidate, potential employer, and recruiter is vital for creating and maintaining a “good vibe” on both sides, especially if there are justified delays, in order to achieve the desired outcome: winning the best candidate for your company who comes on-board motivated and enthusiastic. This is even more important in the international context where communication habits are different from culture to culture, and need to be learned and respected. It’s critical to keep the end-goal in mind: Welcoming a highly-desired and valuable new leader to the team, and ensuring that he/she knows and feels that this will indeed be – to paraphrase from the classic film mentioned earlier – “the beginning of a wonderful employment”.

What experiences have you had – good, bad or weird ones – that would be interesting to share? We look forward to hearing from you and to sharing these stories with others. Email us: [email protected]

Testimonial Spotlight

“Miele USA is highly satisfied with the consistent professionalism and expert consulting the JR BECHTLE team have presented. I have found the firm far superior to other search firms in terms of the effectiveness and communication throughout their process, and their understanding of our culture and our needs. We have complete confidence in JR BECHTLE’s Consultants and the firm’s ability to deliver outstanding quality candidates.”
President

MIELE USA

Parent Companies Should Guide Not Dictate

The relationship between mother and daughter is often fraught with tension, as we all know. This is not very different from relationships between a German parent company and its subsidiary in America.

Globalization- Turning “Us vs. Them” to “We” – part 2

Dealing with the “rift” between the parent company and its subsidiary. This divergence is reflected in relations (and tensions) between the two, on all levels, all processes and coming together to find a solution.

Globalization- Turning “Us vs. Them” to “We”– part 1

Understanding the perspectives of both headquarters and subsidiaries. “The Rift” a real-life issue for many of us in the world of European subsidiaries in North America. Most importantly how to come together and find a solution to be successful.

Niederlassungen im Ausland – Amerika

Ich habe seit vielen Jahren regelmäßig die Möglichkeit im Rahmen von Seminaren in Europa (IHKs, VDMA, Spectaris, SelectUSA, ManagementCircle, amerikanische Generalkonsulate, etc.) kulturelle und geschäftliche Umstände und Regeln der USA…

The Myth Of “Mobility”- What Is It Anyhow?

The question asked frequently by European companies during the recruiting process: If Americans are famously known to be highly mobile…

The Myth Of “Mobility”- What Is It Anyhow?

The question asked frequently by European companies during the recruiting process: If Americans are famously known to be highly mobile…

Management Consultancy and Advisory

Working between different cultures with our clients on the fundamentals and ramifications of new management selections before the recruiting project process even begins.

Deutsche Exporteure: US-Produkthaftungsrisiko beherrschen

Für viele Unternehmen ist Produkthaftung ein rotes Tuch, vor allem, wenn es um den US-Markt geht. Wir hören häufig über Produkthaftungsprozesse vor US…

Bonus Plans Reflect Cultural Differences

America may no longer be the “land of unlimited possibilities” however, there may be more opportunities than in Germany or elsewhere in Europe.

Komplizierte Zeiten

Händeringen überall in der Welt! Speziell über die aktuellen und potentiellen Aktivitäten der amerikanischen Regierung – nicht zuletzt, soweit es Handel und Wandel betrifft. Aber auch, Kopfschütteln über das Chaos im Weißen Haus und dem stetigen Wechsel der führenden Mitarbeiter der Regierung.